What counts as separate property in Nevada?
Separate property in Nevada is defined by statute, not by whose name is on the account. Nevada deeds and decrees often call it “sole and separate property.” NRS 123.130 lists five categories:
- Property owned before the marriage. Savings, a home, a vehicle, investments, a business, anything you held on the wedding date.
- Gifts made to one spouse alone during the marriage.
- Bequests, devises and descent. Property received under a will or by inheritance, whether it arrives before or during the marriage.
- Personal injury awards. Damages for a spouse’s own injuries and pain and suffering. NRS 123.121 treats medical expenses and lost services differently: those go to the community.
- The rents, issues and profits of any of the above. Rent from a premarital rental, dividends on inherited stock, and interest on a gifted account remain separate as long as they can be traced.
Under NRS 123.170, each spouse controls his or her own separate property and can sell or encumber it without the other spouse’s consent.
Why the community property presumption matters
Nevada starts from the assumption that everything acquired during the marriage belongs to both spouses. NRS 123.220 provides that all property other than what NRS 123.130 describes, acquired after marriage by either spouse, is community property unless a written agreement between the spouses, a decree of separate maintenance, or a specific statutory exception says otherwise. Under NRS 123.225, each spouse holds a present, existing and equal interest in that property.
The practical effect is a presumption. In Peters v. Peters, 92 Nev. 687 (1976), the Nevada Supreme Court held that the presumption of community property can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence. That is a high standard. The spouse who says “this was mine before we married” or “this was my inheritance” carries the burden, and a bare assertion will not carry it. Statements, deeds, and account histories will.
This is why characterization, not division, is usually the real fight in a Las Vegas property case. Once an asset is characterized as community, Nevada requires an equal division to the extent practicable, subject only to the compelling-reason exception in NRS 125.150. Whether it is community at all is where the money moves.
Is separate property divided in a Nevada divorce?
No. Separate property is confirmed to the spouse who owns it, and only community property is divided. NRS 125.150(1)(b) requires the court, to the extent practicable, to make an equal disposition of the community property, and permits an unequal division only when the court finds a compelling reason and sets forth its reasons in writing. Financial misconduct, such as wasting or hiding community assets, is the recognized example. Our dissipation guide covers that exception.
One caveat clients rarely hear: NRS 125.150(5) allows the court to set apart a portion of either spouse’s separate property for the support of the other spouse or the children when that is just and equitable. Separate property is protected from division, not from every support order.
Is an inheritance separate property in Nevada?
Yes. Property received by bequest, devise or descent is separate property under NRS 123.130, whether you received it before or during the marriage, and the income it generates stays separate too. The inheritance is only at risk if you change its character afterward. Depositing it into the joint checking account that pays the mortgage, using it for a down payment on a house titled in both names, or spending it on community expenses without a paper trail each invites the argument that the inheritance was given to the community or can no longer be identified.
Illustration. A spouse inherits $50,000 and deposits it into the couple’s joint checking account, which also receives both paychecks and pays the household bills. Two years later the balance is $12,000. At divorce, the inheriting spouse claims $50,000 back. Unless that spouse can show, statement by statement, which withdrawals came from the inheritance and which came from wages, the court has no way to identify the separate funds, and the community presumption controls what is left. Had the $50,000 gone into an account in the inheriting spouse’s name alone with no community deposits, establishing the trace would ordinarily be far simpler, because the distribution records and the account history would provide a clear paper trail.
Can separate property become community property?
Yes, but not by the passage of time. Separate property changes character through what the owner does with it. Nevada courts call this transmutation, and it must be proved by clear and convincing evidence. The common routes are:
Commingling
Separate and community funds are mixed in one account until they can no longer be told apart. Commingling by itself does not convert the property, but it shifts a practical burden onto the separate property spouse to trace what went in and what came out. If the trace fails, the asset is treated as community.
Retitling
Adding a spouse’s name to a deed or account is strong evidence of intent to share. Nevada courts have long treated a joint tenancy deed as presumptively what it says, and undoing it requires clear and convincing evidence of a contrary agreement.
Written agreement
NRS 123.220 expressly allows spouses to change character by a writing. A postnuptial agreement can convert separate property to community or the reverse; see our postnuptial agreement guide.
Trusts
Under NRS 123.125, property moved into a qualifying irrevocable trust keeps its character unless transmutation is proved by clear and convincing evidence.
The opposite direction exists too. Community property can become separate by written agreement or by a decree of separate maintenance, which is one reason some couples pursue legal separation before divorce.
How do you prove property is separate?
You trace it: from its origin, through every account or asset it passed through, to what exists at divorce. The Nevada Supreme Court’s decision in Malmquist v. Malmquist, 106 Nev. 231, 792 P.2d 372 (1990), shows how unforgiving this is. The husband claimed that $37,707 spent on a greenhouse came from the sale of an apartment building he owned separately. The money had passed through a joint checking account that held both community and separate funds. His counsel started to trace the transactions, stopped, and the district court found the trace incomplete. The Supreme Court affirmed: the greenhouse was community property because the husband failed to meet his burden of tracing the funds to his separate property.
Both spouses disclose all of this on the Financial Disclosure Form required in the Eighth Judicial District Court’s Family Division, and the other side’s FDF is where tracing gaps first show. In contested Las Vegas cases, the tracing is often the most expensive part of the property fight.
Tracing is easier to build before positions harden. If you are separating with premarital, gifted, or inherited assets in play, schedule a consultation or call (702) 979-1455.
The house you bought before marriage
The house stays separate property, but the community can earn an interest in it. When community funds (either spouse’s wages during the marriage) pay down the mortgage on a separate property home, Malmquist holds that the community is entitled to reimbursement for the principal it paid and to a pro rata share of the home’s appreciation, calculated from how much of the purchase price each estate contributed. The separate estate keeps the rest. The same logic applies when community funds pay for improvements. This is an apportionment, not a conversion: the home does not become community, but a slice of its equity does, and the decree has to account for it.
Retirement accounts and businesses started before marriage
The portion that existed before the marriage is generally separate; the contributions and growth during the marriage are community. For a 401(k), pension, or PERS account, the court apportions by the period of contribution, and the community share is transferred under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order.
A business founded before marriage is separate property under NRS 123.130, but the growth that came from a spouse’s labor during the marriage may carry a community interest, and the business owner’s compensation and reinvestment decisions are scrutinized. Our business valuation guide and high net worth divorce page cover how those interests are measured.
Do debts from before the marriage stay separate?
Yes. NRS 123.050 provides that neither a spouse’s separate property nor that spouse’s share of the community is liable for the other spouse’s debts contracted before the marriage. Student loans, a car loan, or credit card balances brought into the marriage remain the separate obligation of the spouse who incurred them. Debts incurred during the marriage are presumed community and are divided with the community estate.
How to protect separate property
Separate property is protected by conduct and paper, not by intention.
- Sign a premarital or postnuptial agreement. NRS 123.010 makes an enforceable agreement under NRS Chapter 123A the first exception to the community property rules. See our Nevada prenuptial agreement guide.
- Keep separate accounts separate. No community deposits into the account that holds premarital or inherited funds, and no household bills paid from it.
- Do not retitle. Adding a spouse to a deed, title, or account is the most common way separate property is lost.
- Document contributions both ways. If separate funds must go toward a community purchase, record the amount and date in writing at the time.
- Keep the origin records. Date of marriage statements, wills, gift letters, and settlement statements are the evidence the court will require.
- Consider recording an inventory. NRS 123.140 to 123.160 allow a married person to record an inventory of separate property with the county recorder as notice of title. It is rarely used and does not replace tracing, but it exists.
Separate vs. community property at a glance
| Question | Separate property | Community property |
|---|---|---|
| Statute | NRS 123.130 | NRS 123.220, 123.225 |
| Examples | Owned before marriage; gifts; inheritance; personal injury awards; their rents and profits | Wages and everything bought with them during marriage; retirement contributions during marriage |
| Divided at divorce? | No (subject to the NRS 125.150(5) support set aside) | Yes, equally to the extent practicable, unless the court finds a compelling reason for an unequal division and states its reasons in writing (NRS 125.150(1)(b)) |
| Presumption | None; the claimant must prove separate character | Presumed for anything acquired during marriage |
| How it is established | Clear and convincing evidence of separate origin, with tracing where funds were mixed | By the presumption itself; rebutted only by clear and convincing evidence |
| Can it change character? | Yes, by commingling without a trace, retitling, or written agreement | Yes, by written agreement or decree of separate maintenance |
Is the asset yours, or the community’s? That question decides more in a Nevada divorce than the split itself. Gastelum Attorneys has handled more than 5,000 Clark County family law cases since 2018, in English and Spanish.
Call (702) 979-1455 or schedule a consultation online. Servicios en español.
New Beginnings, Brighter Tomorrows
Sources: NRS Chapter 123 (Rights of Married Couples) and NRS 125.150, Nevada Legislature; Malmquist v. Malmquist, 106 Nev. 231, 792 P.2d 372 (1990); Peters v. Peters, 92 Nev. 687, 557 P.2d 713 (1976). This page is general information about Nevada law and is not legal advice for your situation. Related: Community property in a Nevada divorce and Las Vegas divorce lawyers.



